Gauhati High Court
Review.Pet./283/2025 of SRI BIMAN GOGOI Vs SRI MRIGEN GOGOI AND 7 ORS on 3 May 2026
GAHC010266992025 2026:GAU-AS:6059 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./283/2025 SRI BIMAN GOGOI SON OF LATE LAKESWAR GOGOI, VILL- BHAKAT GAON, P.O. AND P.S.- MATHURAPUR, DIST- CHARAIDEO, PIN- 785689, ASSAM VERSUS SRI MRIGEN
GAHC010266992025
2026:GAU-AS:6059
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet./283/2025
SRI BIMAN GOGOI
SON OF LATE LAKESWAR GOGOI, VILL- BHAKAT GAON, P.O. AND P.S.- MATHURAPUR, DIST- CHARAIDEO, PIN- 785689, ASSAM
VERSUS
SRI MRIGEN GOGOI AND 7 ORS
S/O LATE PUNAKANTA GOGOI, R/O MATHURAPUR BHAKAT GAON, P.O.
AND P.S. MATHURAPUR, DIST. CHARAIDEO, PIN 785689, ASSAM.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
OF ASSAM
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006
3:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
PANJABARI
JURIPAR
GUWAHATI-37
ASSAM.
4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
CHARAIDEO
P.O. AND P.S.- SONARI
DIST- CAHARAIDEO
PIN- 785690
ASSAM.
5:THE PRESIDENT
CHARAIDEO ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. AND P.S.- SONARI
DIST- CAHARAIDEO
PIN- 785690
ASSAM.
6:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CHARAIDEO ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. AND P.S.- SONARI
DISTCAHARAIDEO
PIN- 785690
ASSAM.
7:LAKUWA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
LAKUWA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT
P.O.- LAKUWA
P.S.- MATHURAPUR
DIST- CHARAIDEO
PIN785689
ASSAM
8:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
LAKUWA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT .O.- LAKUWA
P.S.- MATHURAPUR
DISTCHARAIDEO
PIN- 785689
ASSAM
Advocate for the petitioner(s): None appears Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. R Gogoi for the respondent No.1
Mr. S Dutta, Standing Counsel, P & RD
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
04.05.2026
None appears on behalf of the review petitioner on call.
2. Ms. R Gogoi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the opposite party No.1 and Mr. S Dutta, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the P & RD Department.
3. This is the second time when the matter has been listed and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the review petitioner is not present.
4. Considering the above, it appears that the review petitioner has lost interest in the instant proceedings, for which, the review petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant