Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/909/2026 of THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Vs SMTI ACHALA GOSWAMI AND 3 ORS on 3 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010051672026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/909/2026 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 781 006 2: THE

GAHC010051672026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/909/2026

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 781 006

2: THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION

ASSAM

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI -781 019

VERSUS

SMTI ACHALA GOSWAMI AND 3 ORS

AGE 78 YEARS, W/O - LATE BIRESH CH GOSWAMI, R/O- HOUSE NO. 24, KK

B ROAD, BIDYA MANDIR BYE LANE, CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI, KAMRUP

M, ASSAM, PIN - 781- 003

2:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION

HOUSFED COMPLEX

6TH FLOOR

CENTRAL BLOCK

BELTOLA ROAD

GUWAHATI -781-006.

3:BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

BAMUNIMAIDAM

GUWAHATI

KAMRUP M

ASSAM.

4:THE PRINCIPAL

PRAGJYOTISH COLLEGE

GUWAHATI

KAMRUP M

ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D UPAMANYA, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A R BHUYAN(R1), MS. T SONOWAL(R4),MR. D

NATH(R4),S LASKAR(R1),MR N Z CHOUDHURY(R1)

BEFORE

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

04-05-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury,J)

1. Heard Mr. D. Upamanyu, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants. Also heard Mr. A.R.Bhuyan, learned Senior counsel for the opposite party/respondent No. 1 and Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Govt. counsel for the opposite party/respondent No. 4.

2. The present Interlocutory Application is filed seeking condonation of the delay of 15 days in filing the connected writ appeal against the judgment and order dated 16.06.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 6197/2022.

3. The applicants have sufficiently explained the reasons for the delay and have substantiated that, for reasons beyond their control, they were deflected from approaching the Court promptly and within the prescribed period of limitation. We do not see any negligence, lack of bona fide, or inaction on the part of the applicants/appellants.

4. After going through the averments made at paragraph Nos. 4 (i) & 4 (ii) of the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicants/appellants for condoning the delay of 15 days in preferring the connected appeal.

5. We, therefore, condone the delay.

6. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed off.

7. The Registry to process the appeal and, if found defect free, list the same on 24.06.2026 under the appropriate heading.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead