Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1388/2026 of MS MANARANJAN BRAHMA ENTERPRISE Vs AKASH DEEP on 3 May 2026
GAHC010083802026 2026:GAU-AS:6064 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1388/2026 MS MANARANJAN BRAHMA ENTERPRISE HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DOLAIGAON, UJANPARA, BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 783380 REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE
GAHC010083802026
2026:GAU-AS:6064
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1388/2026
MS MANARANJAN BRAHMA ENTERPRISE
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DOLAIGAON, UJANPARA, BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 783380 REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR
SRI MANARANJAN BRAHMA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.
VERSUS
AKASH DEEP
FORMER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL, KOKRAJHAR, BODOFA NWGWR, BTR, ASSAM 783370
2:SUJIT BAGLARI
ACS
FORMER SECRETARY
BTC
WPT AND BC DEPT
KOKRAJHAR
BODOFA NWGWR
BTR
ASSAM 783370
3:MUKESH CHANDRA SAHU
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
KOKRAJHAR
BODOFA NWGWR
BTR
ASSAM 783370
4:ANUP KUMAR BRAHMA
SECRETARY
BTC
WPT AND BC DEPT
KOKRAJHAR
BODOFA NWGWR
BTR
ASSAM 78337
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. N.J. Khataniar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N.R. Sarma, Standing Counsel BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 04.05.2026
The present application has been filed seeking impleadment of opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 in the accompanying contempt application on the ground that the opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 are the present incumbents to the posts of Principal Secretary, BTC, and Secretary, WPT & BC Department, BTC.
2. Taking into account that their presence would be necessary for effective compliance to the order dated 02.08.2024 passed in WP(C) No. 3478/2022, this Court impleads the opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 in the accompanying contempt application as respondent/contemnor Nos. 3 and 4.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court within 7
(seven) days and the Registry shall on the basis of the said Memo of Parties and the present order make necessary corrections in the cause title and update the same in the CIS.
4. With the above, the I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant