Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4562/2024 of SANJAY SHARMA Vs THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 3 May 2026
GAHC010193532025 2026:GAU-AS:6068 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4562/2024 SANJAY SHARMA S/O- LATE JAY PRAKASH SHARMA C/O- NEW J.B. COMPLEX (1ST FLOOR) FLAT NO. 103 J.P. AGARWAL ROAD SANTIPUR GUWAHATI- 781009 DISTRICT-
GAHC010193532025
2026:GAU-AS:6068
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4562/2024
SANJAY SHARMA
S/O- LATE JAY PRAKASH SHARMA
C/O- NEW J.B. COMPLEX (1ST FLOOR)
FLAT NO. 103
J.P. AGARWAL ROAD
SANTIPUR
GUWAHATI- 781009
DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
THROUGH THE SECRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006.
2:THE COMMISSIONER
GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
UZANBAZAR
GUWAHATI- 781001
ASSAM.
3:MD. JEHIRUL ISLAM
C/O- J.B. COMPLEX
1ST BYE LANE
J.P. AGARWALLA
SANTIPUR
GUWAHATI-781009.
------------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Petitioner-in-person For the Respondent(s) : Mr. P. Nayak, Addl. AG, Assam : Mr. I. A. Hazarika, Advocate BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 04.05.2026
Heard Mr. Sanjay Sharma, the Petitioner-in-person and Mr. P. Nayak, the learned Additional Advocate General who is also the Standing counsel of the GMC appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. I have also heard Mr. I. A. Hazarika, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.3.
2. The case of the Petitioner herein is that directions should be issued to the GMC Authorities to demolish the unauthorized constructions in a minimum time bound programme.
3. It is an admitted fact at the bar that the illegal constructions which were made on the ground floor, third floor as well as on the fourth floor of the building have in the meantime been demolished.
4. Under such circumstances, nothing further remains in the instant writ petition for which the writ petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant