Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2250/2026 of MIRAZUL HOQUE AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 3 May 2026
GAHC010065472026 2026:GAU-AS:6058 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2250/2026 MIRAZUL HOQUE AND ANR S/O- LATE SOFIAL HOQUE, VILL.- PATAKATA, P.O. PATAKATA, P.S. SOUTH SALMARA, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783127.
GAHC010065472026
2026:GAU-AS:6058
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2250/2026
MIRAZUL HOQUE AND ANR
S/O- LATE SOFIAL HOQUE, VILL.- PATAKATA, P.O. PATAKATA, P.S. SOUTH
SALMARA, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783127.
2: ZAHIDUL ISLAM
S/O-ABDUL AZIZ SHEIKH
VILL.- PATAKATA
P.O. PATAKATA
P.S. SOUTH SALMARA
DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783127
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. GOVT OF ASSAM
PANJABARI
JURIPAR
GUWAHATI-37.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SOUTH SALMARA-MANKACHAR DISTRICT
HATSINGIMARI
ASSAM. PIN-783135
4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SOUTH SALMARA-MANKACHAR ZILLA PARISHAD
DISTRICT-SOUTH SALMARA-MANKACHAR
HATSINGIMARI
ASSAM. PIN-783135
5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FEKAMARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT
DISTRICT-SOUTH SALMARA-MANKACHAR
ASSAM. PIN-783135
6:THE SECRETARY
PATAKATA GAON PANCHAYAT
P.O-PATAKATA
P.S-SOUTH SALMARA
DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-78312
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. Islam, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. G. Bokolial, Government Advocate : Mr. S. Dutta, SC, P&RD
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 04.05.2026
Heard Mr. A. Islam, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. S. Dutta, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the P&RD Department.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners herein would not like to pursue the instant writ petition in the present form as there are certain formal defects and would like to file a separate writ petition by removing those formal defects.
3. Apparently, from a perusal of the writ petition, it appears that there are formal defects.
4. Consequently, this Court closes the instant writ petition on withdrawal.
5. Liberty is given to the Petitioners to re-file by removing those formal defects.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant