Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/899/2026 of NILUFA BEGUM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 29 April 2026
GAHC010057522026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/899/2026 NILUFA BEGUM W/O- LT. IMRAN HUSSAIN KHANDAKAR, R/O- H NO. 19B, SARUMOTORIA, DISPUR P.S. DIPUR, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781005 VERSUS THE STATE
GAHC010057522026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/899/2026
NILUFA BEGUM
W/O- LT. IMRAN HUSSAIN KHANDAKAR, R/O- H NO. 19B, SARUMOTORIA, DISPUR P.S. DIPUR, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781005
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, HOME DEPTT., GOVT.
OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI- 781008
3:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
MAIDAM GAON BELTOLA
GUWAHATI- 781021
4:COMMANDANT
22ND ASSAM POLICE (IR) BATTALION
LIKABALI
DHEMAJI
5:MST. CHAJIRAN BEGAM
W/O- LATE HABIBAR RAHAMAN KHANDAKAR
VILL- NAGAON
P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI
KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781381
6:MUSLIM MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE REGISTRAR AND KAZI MAHTOLI
(SONTOLI)
P.O. MAHTOLI
KAMRUP
ASSAM- 781136
7:MUSSTT. SAIRA SULTANA
W/O LATE IMRAN HUSSAIN KHANDAKAR
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 47
PURANABASTI
FAKARUDDIN ALI AHMED PATH
SIX MILE
PS DISPUR
GUWAHATI 22
DIST KAMRUP M ASSA
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. A. Ganguly, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Dhar, Addl. Sr. GA, Assam : Mr. A. S. Tapadar, Advocate : Ms. Tinglung, Standing Counsel BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30.04.2026
This is an application filed by the Petitioner in the accompanying writ petition as applicant to implead the Opposite Party No.7 who was the first wife of the husband of the applicant as a party to the accompanying writ petition on the ground that the presence of the Opposite Party No.7 would be essential for effective adjudication of the dispute.
2. Mr. A. Ganguly, the learned counsel had further referred to the order passed by this Court on 19.02.2026 and submitted that in view of the said order, the accompanying writ proceedings cannot proceed without the Opposite Party No.7 being arrayed as a party to the accompanying writ petition.
3. Taking into account the order dated 19.02.2026 as well as the dispute involved in the instant proceedings, it is the opinion of this Court that the presence of the Opposite Party No.7 to the dispute in hand is necessary for an effective adjudication.
4. Accordingly, the Opposite Party No.7 is arrayed as the Respondent No.7 to the accompanying writ petition.
5. The learned counsel for the Petitioner is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court within 7 (seven) days and the Registry shall on the basis of the present order as well as the Memo of Parties, make necessary correction to the Cause Title of the accompanying writ proceedings as well as update the same in the CIS.
6. I.A. stands allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant