Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/297/2026 of SRI TRILOKI KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 28 April 2026
GAHC010054782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/297/2026 SRI TRILOKI KUMAR S/O KHIYALI DAS, R/O BISHNUPUR HORIZON COLONY, P.S. BHARALUMUKH, DIST. KAMRUP M, GUWAHATI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010054782026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/297/2026
SRI TRILOKI KUMAR
S/O KHIYALI DAS, R/O BISHNUPUR HORIZON COLONY, P.S.
BHARALUMUKH, DIST. KAMRUP M, GUWAHATI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM.
2:SMT. KONIKA DAS
W/O SRI HARI NARAYAN DAS
R/O VILL. SARBHOG
RAMPUR
P.S. SARBHOG
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A TEWARI, MS. O GUPTA,MS. M CHANDALIA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
SRI TRILOKI KUMAR
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. ATAL TEWARI
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29/04/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Ms. M. Chandalia, Learned Counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, Learned senior counsel and APP, Assam, appearing for the State.
2. This is an application for condoning the delay of 139 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant/appellant under section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
3. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned APP, Assam, submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Ms. Bhuyan also submits a letter dated 23/04/2026 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police Mr. Akib Reza of Sorbhog Police Station, which is to the effect that the respondent no. 2 does not reside in the address under the jurisdiction of the Sorbhog Police Station. Further, the Gaonborah of the concerned village, who was consulted, submitted a report confirming that the respondent no. 2 did not reside in the village of Rampur.
4. On consideration of the above, we find that sufficient cause for the delay is made out. Accordingly, the delay of 139 days is condoned.
5. IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant