Gauhati High Court
AB/2345/2025 of ISLAM KHAN Vs THE STATE OFASSAM on 28 April 2026
GAHC010218342025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2345/2025 ISLAM KHAN SON OF SOLEMAN KHAN @ KHOKAN R/O NEW GHAT, W/NO.12, DHUBRI, P.O. A.M. CO. ROAD, P.S. DHUBRI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM PIN-783301. VERSUS THE STATE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010218342025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2345/2025
ISLAM KHAN
SON OF SOLEMAN KHAN @ KHOKAN
R/O NEW GHAT, W/NO.12, DHUBRI, P.O. A.M. CO. ROAD, P.S. DHUBRI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM
PIN-783301.
VERSUS
THE STATE OFASSAM
REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, I AMIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29 .04. 2026 Heard Mr. MH Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 filed by the petitioner namely, ISLAM KHAN, praying for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Dhubri P.S. Case No. 42/2025 (Corresponding to GR Case No. 137/2025) registered under Sections 318(3)/ 64(1)/ 308(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with Page No.# 2/2 Section 67 of the I.T. Act.
3. Earlier bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated 31.07.2025 in AB No. 1208/2025. Subsequently, in the present application vide order dated 13.11.2025, the interim protection was granted to the petitioner on account of subsequent developments in the form of conversations which had taken place between the accused and the informant after rejection of bail prayer.
4. Case diary as called for has not been received. However, it is submitted that pursuant to the summons received from the court the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court and keeping in view the entity of the matter as well as the documents annexed to the instant bail application, prayer for pre- arrest bail is allowed. Accordingly, interim order dated 13.11.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions that the the petitioner:-
(i) shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or any other police officer, in any manner; and
(ii) shall not hamper the investigation or tamper with the evidence of the case.
5. With the above directions, the bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant