Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/611/2026 of SUGRIM PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 28 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010009472026 2026:GAU-AS:5868 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/611/2026 SUGRIM PRASAD S/O- LT. PARAS NATH PRASAD, VILL. MILIK BASTI, P.O. NANDAPUR, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN.- 782435. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS TO

GAHC010009472026

2026:GAU-AS:5868

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/611/2026

SUGRIM PRASAD

S/O- LT. PARAS NATH PRASAD, VILL. MILIK BASTI, P.O. NANDAPUR, DIST.

HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN.- 782435.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6.

2:THE DIRECTOR

ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

ASSAM

KHANAPARA

GUWAHATI-19.

3:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE

FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

OF ASSAM

ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6.

4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE

FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT HOJAI

REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

HOJAI

P.O. AND DIST. HOJAI

ASSAM

5:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

HOJAI

P.O. AND DIST. HOJAI

ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Z HAMMAD, R DAS

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ELEM. EDU

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 29-04-2026 Heard Mr. Z Hammad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. K Phukan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents. [2] Although 2 (two) opportunities were granted to the learned Government Advocate to obtain instructions, but today, she submits that she is yet to receive instructions in the matter. [3] Considering the issue involved, this Court considers that the matter can be disposed of at this stage itself. [4] This is the 2nd time, the petitioner is before this Court. The earlier writ petition, being WP(C) 5679/2023 was disposed of, vide order dated 27.09.2023 by directing the respondent authorities concerned to consider appointing the petitioner on compassionate basis by taking into account Clause-15 of the Office

Memorandum (OM) dated 01.06.2015, wherein it is provided that if there are no subsequent vacancies in a particular office to accommodate the person on compassionate basis, it is open for the Administrative Department/Office to take up the matter with other Departments/Offices of the Government to provide appointment on compassionate basis to those waiting in the list. [5] It is the case of the petitioner that his father died-in-harness on 03.03.2016, while working as a regular Grade-IV employee under the District Elementary Education Officer, Hojai and pursuant to which, he applied for compassionate appointment. The case of the petitioner was considered by the District Level Committee (DLC), Hojai on 15.07.2024 and he was recommended for appointment on compassionate basis and his case was to be placed before the State Level Committee (SLC) for further consideration in terms of Clause-15 of the OM dated 01.06.2015 as was observed by this Court in the earlier round of litigation. Despite the same, since the SLC has not considered his case, the petitioner is once again before this Court. [6] No doubt, the State Government has come up with the Compassionate Family Pension Scheme in lieu of compassionate appointment by issuing OM dated 18.09.2024, but the fact remains that the case of the petitioner is pending consideration after his case was recommended by the DLC concerned on 15.07.2024, pursuant to the direction passed by this Court on 27.09.2023. Such being the case, it cannot be said that the case of the petitioner will be covered by the OM dated 18.09.2024. [7] In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent authorities concerned to place the case of the petitioner before the next SLC concerned for considering his appointment on compassionate basis.

The SLC in making such consideration shall also take into account Clause-15 of the OM dated 01.06.2015.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead