Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/3975/2025 of FAKARUDDIN AHMED Vs AYUB ALI on 28 April 2026
GAHC010091072025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3975/2025 FAKARUDDIN AHMED S/O LATE ASIRUDDIN AHMED, R/O VILL- RONTHOLI, P.S.-KALAIGAON, DIST UDALGURI 2: AKHTAR HUSSAIN S/O LATE ASIRUDDIN AHMED R/O VILL-
GAHC010091072025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3975/2025
FAKARUDDIN AHMED
S/O LATE ASIRUDDIN AHMED, R/O VILL- RONTHOLI, P.S.-KALAIGAON, DIST UDALGURI
2: AKHTAR HUSSAIN
S/O LATE ASIRUDDIN AHMED
R/O VILL- RONTHOLI
P.S.-KALAIGAON
DIST0UDALGUR
VERSUS
AYUB ALI
S/O LATE SABAR ALI, R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT, MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI, P.S.-SIPAJHAR, DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM-784144
2:RATNESWAR KALITA
S/O LATE ARABINDA KALITA
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
3:LOHIT KALITA
S/O LATE RATNESWAR KALITA
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
4:BIRESWAR KALITA
S/O LATE RATNESWAR KALITA
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
5:MD. KHATIMUDDIN
S/O LATE MAJA ULLAH
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
6:MD. SAMSUDDIN
S/O LATE ABBAS SK
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
7:AZIZUR RAHMAN
S/O ASIRUDDIN AHMED
R/O VILL- RONTHOLI
P.S.-KALAIGAON
DIST-UDALGURI
ASSAM
8:ALAUDDIN AHMED
S/O ASIRUDDIN AHMED
R/O VILL- RONTHOLI
P.S.-KALAIGAON
DIST-UDALGURI
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R SENSUA, G KAUSHIK,R A LAHKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : M HOSSAIN, MD A WADUD(R-1),MR J HUSSAIN(R-1)
Linked Case : CRP(IO)/473/2024
FAKARUDDIN AHMED AND ANR
R/O VILL- RONTHOLI
P.S.-KALAIGAON
DIST0UDALGURI
Page No.# 3/5
2: AKHTAR HUSSAIN
S/O LATE ASIRUDDIN AHMED
R/O VILL- RONTHOLI
P.S.-KALAIGAON
DIST0UDALGURI
VERSUS
AYUB ALI AND 7 ORS
S/O LATE SABAR ALI
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
2:RATNESWAR KALITA
S/O LATE ARABINDA KALITA
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
3:LOHIT KALITA
S/O LATE RATNESWAR KALITA
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
4:BIRESWAR KALITA
S/O LATE RATNESWAR KALITA
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
5:MD. KHATIMUDDIN
S/O LATE MAJA ULLAH
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
6:MD. SAMSUDDIN
S/O LATE ABBAS SK
R/O VILL- PATHARIGHAT
MOUZA- RAINAKUCHI
P.S.-SIPAJHAR
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
7:AZIZUR RAHMAN
S/O ASIRUDDIN AHMED
R/O VILL- RONTHOLI
P.S.-KALAIGAON
DIST-UDALGURI
ASSAM
8:ALAUDDIN AHMED
S/O ASIRUDDIN AHMED
R/O VILL- RONTHOLI
P.S.-KALAIGAON
DIST-UDALGURI
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR R SENSUA
Advocate for : M HOSSAIN (R-1) appearing for AYUB ALI AND 7 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29.04.2026 Heard Mr. G. Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M. Hossain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that at the time of withdrawal of CRP(IO)473/2024, while granting liberty by this Court to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the Court of the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division No. 1, Darrang, Mangaldai, vide order dated 07.04.2025; inadvertently, it was reflected as “Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908”, instead of “Order IX Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908”.
3. By way of filing this interlocutory application, the applicant seeks correction of the order dated 07.04.2025 to the extent that it shall be read as “Order IX Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908” instead of “Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908”.
4. The prayer not being objected to by Mr. Hossain, learned counsel for the Opposite Party, is accepted.
5. Accordingly, the order dated 07.04.2025; stands corrected to the extent that it shall be read as “Order IX Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ”instead of “Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908”.
6. The interlocutory application accordingly stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant