Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/1994/2026 of RATILALL SARKAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 28 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010069672026 2026:GAU-AS:5870 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1994/2026 RATILALL SARKAR HEAD MASTER, BHAWRAGURI M.E. SCHOOL, S/O- LT.. PROMOTH CHANDRA SARKAR, VILL.- BHAWRAGURI-PART-II, P.O.- BHAWRAGURI, DIST.-

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010069672026

2026:GAU-AS:5870

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/1994/2026

RATILALL SARKAR

HEAD MASTER, BHAWRAGURI M.E. SCHOOL, S/O- LT.. PROMOTH

CHANDRA SARKAR, VILL.- BHAWRAGURI-PART-II, P.O.- BHAWRAGURI, DIST.- KOKRAJHAR,, BTC, ASSAM, PIN- 783336

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY

(ASSAM)

2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BTC KOKRAJHAR

DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR

3:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR

DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR

4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

KOKRAJHAR

DISTRICT KOKRAJHAR BTC

5:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF GOSSAIGAON

DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR BTC

6:THE TREASURY OFFICER

GOSSAIGAON

DISTRICT- KOKRAJHA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H ALI, MS A DAS

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, SC, BTC,SC, FINANCE DEPTT.

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 29-04-2026 Mr. H Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has inadvertently failed to incorporate all the reliefs and title to him, he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Ms. R Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. B Bhuyan, learned Standing Counsel, BTC and Ms. K Phukan, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent Nos. 3 & 5 have no objection to the prayer. Therefore, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead