Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/1545/2026 of MEHBUB HUSSAIN LASKAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 28 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010049632026 2026:GAU-AS:5898 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1545/2026 MEHBUB HUSSAIN LASKAR SON OF LATE SAFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR, RESIDENT OF AMINO RAHEMAN LANE, MALUGRAM, MELA ROAD, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788002.

GAHC010049632026

2026:GAU-AS:5898

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/1545/2026

MEHBUB HUSSAIN LASKAR

SON OF LATE SAFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR, RESIDENT OF AMINO

RAHEMAN LANE, MALUGRAM, MELA ROAD, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788002.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, IRRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,GUWAHATI- 6

2:THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT

ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 6.

3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER

IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT

ASSAM

CHANDMARI

GUWAHATI- 781003

ASSAM.

4:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

BARAK VALLEY CIRCLE

IRRIGATION

SILCHAR

CACHAR

ASSAM

5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

SILCHAR DIVISION (IRRIGATION)

KANAKPUR

SILCHAR- 6

CACHAR

ASSAM

6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

DHOLAI-SONAI DIVISION (IRRIGATION)

DHOLAI

CACHAR

ASSAM.

7:THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER

DHOLAI-SONAI DIVISION (IRRIGATION)

DHOLAI

CACHAR

ASSAM.

8:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E)

ASSAM

MAIDAMGAON

BELTOLA

GUWAHATI- 29

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. Chakraborty, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R.K. Talukdar, Standing Counsel BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 29.04.2026

Mr. D. Chakraborty, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already received the amount for which the instant writ petition had been filed and as such, submitted that the petitioner would not like to further pursue with the instant writ petition. In that regard, the learned counsel has placed before this Court a communication issued by the Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Assam dated 30.03.2026 which is kept on record and marked with the letter “X”.

2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead