Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2223/2026 of MD JIYAUR PASA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 28 April 2026
GAHC010079662026 2026:GAU-AS:5891 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2223/2026 MD JIYAUR PASA S/O LATE SALIM PASA NALBARI TOWN WARD NO.-8, P.S. AND P.O.- NALBARI, DISTRICT- NALBARI, ASSAM- 781335 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5
GAHC010079662026
2026:GAU-AS:5891
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2223/2026
MD JIYAUR PASA
S/O LATE SALIM PASA NALBARI TOWN WARD NO.-8, P.S. AND P.O.- NALBARI, DISTRICT- NALBARI, ASSAM- 781335
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO
THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS (ROADS) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS)
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM- 781003
3:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER CUM DIRECTOR
PWD
BTC
KOKRAJHAR- 783371
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINNER
PWD (ROADS)
MUSHALPUR (R AND B) DIVISION
MUSHALPUR
BAKSA
ASSAM- 781372
5:SRI NIPUL KALITA
S/O SRI SARAT KALITA
VILL AND P.O.- SONDHA
P.S. AND DISTRICT- NALBARI
ASSAM- 781337
6:NATIONAL RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL
KRISHI BHAWAN
NEW DELHI- 11000
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Hoque, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B.C. Muchahary, Standing Counsel Mr. M. Bhuyan, Advocate BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29.04.2026
Mr. S. Hoque, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would like to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to re-file the same, taking into account that the petitioner failed to seek certain reliefs which were necessary for proper and effective adjudication of the present dispute. The learned counsel, therefore, submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to re-file.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. The petitioner is granted liberty to re-file the writ petition.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant