Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/861/2026 of SRI TAPASH RANJAN DAS AND 6 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 28 April 2026
GAHC010042692026 2026:GAU-AS:5887 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/861/2026 SRI TAPASH RANJAN DAS AND 6 ORS SON OF LATE CITTA RANJAN DAS RESIDENT OF AKSHOY SARANI SATSANGHA ASRAM RAOD CHIBITABICHA PT IX PO VIVEKANANDA
GAHC010042692026
2026:GAU-AS:5887
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/861/2026
SRI TAPASH RANJAN DAS AND 6 ORS
SON OF LATE CITTA RANJAN DAS RESIDENT OF AKSHOY SARANI
SATSANGHA ASRAM RAOD CHIBITABICHA PT IX PO VIVEKANANDA
ROAD PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 788007
2: SRI RATHINDRA KUMAR NATH
SON OF LATE RABENDRA CH NATH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UTTAR
GANAKGARI PO AND PS SORBHOG DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM 781317
3: SRI MUNINDRA PATAR
SON OF LATE DIMBESWAR PATAR RESIDENT OF VILL PATIDAYA PO
PATIDAYA PS MARIGAON DISTRICT MORIGAON 782104 ASSAM
4: SRI GOKULA NANDA SINGHA
SON OF NIKUNJA BEHARI SINGHA RESIDENT OF VILL NATUN BAZAR
WARD NO 03 HOJAI 782435
5: SRI RAJASHREE NAIDING
SON OF TAPASH PURUSA RESIDENT OF VILL HAFLONG GOVT COLLEGE
COLLEGE ROAD HAFLONG NORTH CACHAR NILLS ASSAM 788819
6: SRI JABA TALUKDAR
DAUGHTER OF KAMAL TALUKDAR RESIDENT OF VILL SWADESH
NAGAR DREAMLAND AMUSEMENT PARK KHANAPARA 781022 ASSAM
7: SRI KESHABANANDA BORDOLOI
SON OF LATE GAHIN BORDOLOI VILLAGE BARACHILA PO BEBEJIA
DISTRICT MORIGAON 78214
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT
OF ASSAM COOPERATION DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006
2:THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI 22
3:SANJAY KR BARMAN
SON OF LATE KAMINI BARMAN SR INSPECTOR ARCS CACHAR SILCHAR
DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM
4:SHRI RAMKAMAL SINHA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS JR INSPECTOR ARCS CACHAR SILCHAR
DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM
5:JAHIR RIZWAN CHOUDHURY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SR INSPECTOR AUDITOR ARCS HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
6:RAJIB AHMED LASKAR
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS JR INSPECTOR AUDITOR RAMKRISHNA NAGAR
ARCS KARIMGANJ DISTRICT KARIMGANJ ASSAM
7:NUR AHMED LASKAR
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS JR INSPECTOR AUDITOR ARCS CACHAR
SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM
8:NURUL HUSAN MAZUMDAR
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SR INSPECTOR AUDITOR ARCS HAILAKANDI
DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM
9:SHRI AJOY BAISHYA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS JR INSPECTOR ARCS CACHAR SILCHAR
10:ABU SHARIF ALI
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SR INSPECTOR AUDITOR RCS GUWAHATI 22
DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSAM
11:NABAJYOTI PATOWARY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS SR INSPECTOR AUDITOR RCS GUWAHATI 22
DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S HAZARIKA, MS M HAZARIKA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CO OP, MR B SINHA
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.04.2026 Heard Mr. S. Hazarika, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. By filing this application under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the applicants seeks impleadment in WP(C) No. 3684/2021 as respondent Nos. 3 to 9, as they are necessary parties for proper adjudication of the case, and any adverse order passed in the aforesaid writ petition would cause prejudice to them.
3. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have no objection to impleading the applicants as respondent Nos. 3 to 9 in the aforesaid writ petition.
4. In view of the above, the prayer for impleadment is allowed.
5. Accordingly, the present applicant Nos. 1 to 7 are impleaded as respondent Nos. 4 to 10 in the aforementioned writ petition, as respondent No. 3 has already been impleaded as per this Court’s order dated 27.04.2022.
6. With the above observation, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant