Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1130/2026 of THE STATE OF ASSAM and ORS Vs SOUTH BANK MULTIPURPOSE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD on 28 April 2026
GAHC010058992026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/1130/2026 THE STATE OF ASSAM and ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 2: THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010058992026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
I.A.(Civil)/1130/2026
THE STATE OF ASSAM and ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF FOOD
PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
2: THE COMMISSIONER OF FOOD
PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND LEGAL METROLOGY
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-07
3: THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR DISTRICT
ASSAM
P.O. HATSINGIMARI
PIN 783135
4: THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
FOOD
PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CONSUMER AFFAIRS
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
P.O. HATSINGIMARI
ASSAM
PIN-783135
5: THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
OF SUPPLY IN CHARGE
FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CONSUMER AFFAIRS
ASSAM. DIST-SOUTH SALMARA KANKACHAR
P.O.- HATSINGIMARI
PIN-783135
Page No.# 2/2
VERSUS
SOUTH BANK MULTIPURPOSE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY NAMELY ZIAUR RAHMAN
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S.O. LATE MONSER ALI
VILLAGE AND P.O. JHOWDANGA
DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-783131
Advocate for the applicant(s): Ms. U Das Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. R Islam B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.04.2026
Ms. U Das, the learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant would not like to press the instant application in view of the order passed in the accompanying writ petition.
2. The learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate further submits that the said application may be kept on record for the purpose of deciding the issues in the accompanying writ petition.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant application stands closed.
4. However, the records of the interlocutory application be tagged along with the accompanying writ petition for future adjudication of the writ petition.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant