Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1011/2026 of SANJIB BHATTACHAREE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 28 April 2026
GAHC010054282026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1011/2026 SANJIB BHATTACHAREE S/O- SHASHANKA BHATTACHARJEE R/O- INDRAORASTHA APARTMENT TRIPURA ROAD JAYA NAGAR PO- KHANAPARA DIST- KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI ASSAM-
GAHC010054282026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1011/2026
SANJIB BHATTACHAREE
S/O- SHASHANKA BHATTACHARJEE
R/O- INDRAORASTHA APARTMENT
TRIPURA ROAD
JAYA NAGAR
PO- KHANAPARA
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM- 781022
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
ASSAM
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM- 781003
3:THE TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION COMMITTEE
FOR TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF
ENGINEER
ASSAM
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-03
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TIHU IRRIGATION DIVISION
TIHU
ASSAM- 781371
5:M/S AXOM INFRA TECH
HOUSE NO. 188M PAGATI PATH
BEHIND MLA HOSTEL
DISPUR GUWAHATI 06
6:ASHOK KUMAR BAJAJ
WARD NO. 2
UDALGURI TOWN
784509
------------
Advocate for : MD S HOQUE
Advocate for : SC
IRRIGATION appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29.04.2026
This is an application filed for impleading the opposite party Nos. 5 and 6 in the accompanying writ petition.
2. Taking into account that the petitioner has assailed the rejection of its technical bid, and in terms with the judgment of the Supreme Court in Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Another reported in (2016) 16 SCC 818, the Supreme Court had categorically observed that other technically competent bidders are required to be made parties, it is the opinion of this Court that the instant application is required to be allowed.
3. Accordingly, the present Interlocutory Application stands allowed, thereby impleading the opposite party Nos. 5 and 6 in the accompanying writ petition as respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court within 7 (seven) days and the Registry shall on the basis of the said Memo of Parties and the present order make necessary corrections in the cause title and update the same in the CIS.
5. With the above, the I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant