Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/328/2026 of BIBEK RAJMUKHI @ NAYAK Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 28 April 2026
GAHC010045232026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/328/2026 BIBEK RAJMUKHI @ NAYAK S/O LATE BARRUN RAJMUKHI, R/O VILL- HARIGAON, P.S.- TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010045232026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/328/2026
BIBEK RAJMUKHI @ NAYAK
S/O LATE BARRUN RAJMUKHI, R/O VILL- HARIGAON, P.S.- TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:SMT. BHULUNG NAYAK
S/O LATE ROBI NAYAK
R/O VILL- KUSUM TULA
P.S.- JAMUGURI
P.O.- JAMUGURI
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM
PIN-78411
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A KHANIKAR, MR B DEORI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, R L CHUTIA(R2)
Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
BIBEK RAJMUKHI
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
REPRESENTED BY PP
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR BHASKAR DEORI
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29-04-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. A. Khanikar, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 84 days in preferring the connected appeal against conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P. and Mr. R.L. Chutia, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submit that they have got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 84 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant