Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./709/2026 of ABUL FARUK AZAD ALIES PINTU Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 28 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010048732026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./709/2026 ABUL FARUK AZAD ALIES PINTU SON OF ABDUL KALAM AZAD R/O - PALHAJI, P.O - PALHAJI, PIN- 781309, DIST -BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM PUBLIC

GAHC010048732026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./709/2026

ABUL FARUK AZAD ALIES PINTU

SON OF ABDUL KALAM AZAD

R/O - PALHAJI, P.O - PALHAJI, PIN- 781309, DIST -BARPETA, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B B GOGOI, MD. K ISLAM,MRS. S KHATANIAR

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 29 . 04. 2026 Heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent.

2. This bail application has been preferred by the petitioner namely, ABUL FARUK AZAD @ PINTU under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking bail in connection with Mukalmua P.S. Case

No. 05/2026 registered under Sections 318(4)/ 316(2)/ 61(2)(b)/ 323/ 338/ 336(3)/ 340(2)/ 111(2)(b)/ 111(4) of the BNS, 2023 read with Sections 43/ 66/ 66(C)/ 66(D)/ 24(C) of the I.T. Act, who was arrested on 29.01.2026.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the main accused Babi Dul Islam has already been granted bail in connection with the said case and the present petitioner has spent 90 days as on today in custody. The learned Addl. P.P. submits that since the case diary is not updated, the information whether the charge sheet has been submitted or nor is not available.

4. Be that as it may, the principal accused Babi Dul Islam has already been granted bail and as such the present petitioner namely Abul Faruk Azad @ Pintu is entitled to be released on bail.

5. Having regard to the above, it is provided that the petitioner above named shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only with 2 (two) sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Eleka Magistrate.

6. It is further provided that the petitioner:-

(i) shall continue to cooperate with the trial of the case as when commences well as the investigation of the case as and when requires;

(ii) shall not hamper the investigation or tamper with the evidence of the case; and

(iii) shall not try to influence any persons or witnesses acquainted with facts of the case, in any manner.

7. With the aforesaid direction, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead