Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1455/2026 of NURJAHAN BEGUM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 28 April 2026
GAHC010055472026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1455/2026 NURJAHAN BEGUM W/O MALIKUDDIN AHMED D/O LATE SOMIRUDDIN AHMED R/O VILL. PACHANIAPARA BONGORA P.O. BONGRA P.S. AZARA DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE
GAHC010055472026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1455/2026
NURJAHAN BEGUM
W/O MALIKUDDIN AHMED
D/O LATE SOMIRUDDIN AHMED
R/O VILL. PACHANIAPARA
BONGORA
P.O. BONGRA
P.S. AZARA
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF
ASSAM
REVENUE AND SETTLEMENT DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY 06
2:THE COLLECTOR / THE DIST. COMMISSIONER
REVENUE AND SETTLEMENT BRANCH
KAMRUP M
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM GHY 37.
3:THE CO DIST. COMMISSIONER
JALUKBARI CO DIST.
JALUKBARI
GUWAHATI SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM
GUWAHATI 14
4:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
KAMRUP M
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM
GUWAHATI 01
5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
AZARA REVENUE CIRCLE
AZARA
P.O. AZARA
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM
GUWAHATI 17
6:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF AZARA POLICE STATION
AZARA
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM
GUWAHATI 17
------------
Advocate for : MR S HOQUE
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.04.2026 Heard Mr. S Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N Das, learned Government Advocate and Ms. N Bordoloi, learned Standing counsel, Revenue Department for the respondents. Mr. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has received instruction not to press the instant writ petition, with liberty to file afresh.
Prayer is allowed, with liberty as sought for. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the instant writ petition, being not pressed, stands dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant