Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1188/2026 of M/S V.S.R. ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 28 April 2026
GAHC010071302026 2026:GAU-AS:5897 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1188/2026 M/S V.S.R. ENTERPRISES HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT H/NO. 2, MILIJULI PATH, BELTOLA TINIALI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781028 AND REPRESENTED BY ITS
GAHC010071302026
2026:GAU-AS:5897
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1188/2026
M/S V.S.R. ENTERPRISES
HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT H/NO. 2, MILIJULI PATH, BELTOLA
TINIALI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781028 AND REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED AGENT MR. RAJAPPA NANJUNDA PRASAD SON OF SRI
SIDDAPPA RAJAPPA, AGED AROUND 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BLOCK NO.
AB5, QTR. NO. 12, G.M.C. NEW COLONY, P.O. BHARALUMKUKH, P.S.
FATASIL AMBARI, GUWAHATI- 781009.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECY. WATER RESOURCES DEPTT.
HAVING ITS AT WATER RESOURCES DEPTT., HAVING OFFICE AT WATER
RESOURCES DEPTT., BLOCK C, 3RD FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR
6
2:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MARIGAON WATER RESOURCES DIVISION
ERAGAON
WARD NO. 6
NEAR TARUN FIELD
P.O. MORIGAON
DISTRICT MORIGAON
ASSAM- 782105.
3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
ASSAM WATER CENTRE
5TH FLOOR
NEAR ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE BHAWAN
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI
DISTRICT KAMRUP (M)
PIN 781029.
4:THE UNION OF INDIA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI
DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES
SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN
RAFI MARG
NEW DELHI110001.
5:THE CHAIRMAN
BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD
MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI 78102
Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. A Choudhury Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. K Gogoi, CGC
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.04.2026
This is an application for impleadment of the opposite party Nos.4 and 5 to the accompanying writ petition.
2. Taking into account the stand which has been taken by the Water Resources Department, it is the opinion of this Court that the presence of the opposite party Nos.4 and 5 would be necessary for the purpose of proper adjudication of the accompanying writ petition.
3. Accordingly the opposite party Nos.4 and 5 are impleaded as respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to the accompanying writ petition.
4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties within 7(seven) days from today before the Registry of this Court and the Registry on the basis of the instant order as well as the fresh memo of parties shall make the necessary correction in the cause-title of the writ petition and update the same in the CIS.
5. Interlocutory application stands disposed of in the above terms.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant