Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/293/2026 of BARUN KALITA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 28 April 2026
GAHC010049962026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/293/2026 BARUN KALITA S/O SARAT KALITA, R/O ANANDA DAIMARY PATH, GANESHPARA, P.S. FATASIL AMBARI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010049962026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/293/2026
BARUN KALITA
S/O SARAT KALITA, R/O ANANDA DAIMARY PATH, GANESHPARA, P.S.
FATASIL AMBARI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
2:PURNIMA DAS
W/O SRI APU DAS
A R/O VILL. KUSHAL NAGAR
CHANDMARI
P.S. CHANDMARI
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. L DEVI, LEGAL AID COUNSEL
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
SRI BARUN KALITA
S/O SARATKALITA
RESIDENT OF ANANDADAIMARY PATH
GANESHPARA
P.S.- FATASIL AMBARI
DISTRICT -KAMRUP M
ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/2
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY PP
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : LOVELY DEVI
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29/04/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Ms. L. Devi, Learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, Learned APP, Assam, appearing for the State.
2. This is an application for condoning the delay of 103 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant/appellant under section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
3. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned APP, Assam, submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned.
4. On consideration of the above, we condone the delay of 103 days.
5. IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant