Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/329/2026 of MS. GITA SAHANI Vs STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 28 April 2026
GAHC010058002026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/329/2026 MS. GITA SAHANI (VICTIM), D/O SATYA NARAYAN SAHANI, R/O TITABOR STATION TINIALI, P.O.- TITABOR- 785630, P.S.- TITABOR, DIST- JORHAT (ASSAM) VERSUS STATE
GAHC010058002026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/329/2026
MS. GITA SAHANI
(VICTIM), D/O SATYA NARAYAN SAHANI, R/O TITABOR STATION TINIALI, P.O.- TITABOR- 785630, P.S.- TITABOR, DIST- JORHAT (ASSAM)
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:AMAN PRASAD GUPTA
S/O KAMAKHYA GUPTA
R/O TITABOR CHARIALI
TITABOR
JORHAT
ASSAM- 78563
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. R SARMAH, MS P SAHA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. S J SARMAH(R2)
Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
MS GITA SAHANI
(VICTIM)
D/O SATYA NARAYAN SAHANI
R/O TITABOR STATION TINIALI
P.O.- TITABOR- 785630
P.S.- TITABOR
DIST- JORHAT (ASSAM)
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ASSAM
2:AMAN PRASAD GUPTA
S/O KAMAKHYA GUPTA
R/O TITABOR CHARIALI
TITABOR
JORHAT
ASSAM- 785630
------------
Advocate for : DR. R SARMAH
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29-04-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Dr. R. Sarmah, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 8 days in preferring the connected appeal against acquittal of the respondent under Section 376/417 IPC. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P. submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 8 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant