Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2072/2026 of PRAG BOSIMI SYNTHETICS LIMITED Vs ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND 2 ORS. on 27 April 2026
GAHC010058052026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2072/2026 PRAG BOSIMI SYNTHETICS LIMITED HOUSE NO. 4, NILGIRI PATH, R.G. BARUAH ROAD, NEAR DOORDARSHAN, GUWAHATI, ASSAM-781024. VERSUS ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010058052026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2072/2026
PRAG BOSIMI SYNTHETICS LIMITED
HOUSE NO. 4, NILGIRI PATH, R.G. BARUAH ROAD, NEAR DOORDARSHAN, GUWAHATI, ASSAM-781024.
VERSUS
ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND 2 ORS.
CIRCLE - 1, GUWAHATI, 613, 6TH FLOOR, AAYKAR BHAWAN, CHRISTIAN
BASTI, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI, ASSAM - 781 005
2:PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
GUWAHATI-1
705
7TH FLOOR AAYKAR BHAWAN
CHRISTIAN BASTI
G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI
ASSAM-781005.
3:UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH THE SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA BLOCK
NEW DELHI-110001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R J DAS, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. S S ROY,SC, INCOME TAX
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28.04.2026 Heard Mr. N. Gandhi, learned counsel, appearing through video conferencing mode, assisted by Mr. R. J. Das, learned counsel, for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Chetia, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2, and Mr. S. S. Roy, learned CGC, appearing for the respondent No.
3. During the pendency of the present writ petition, in which the reassessment notice was under challenge, a final order came to be passed in terms of the order dated 22.04.2026. The petitioner has since instituted WP(C) No. 2235/2026 assailing both the reassessment order and the consequential final order. In this view of the matter, Mr. N. Gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw WP(C) No. 2072/2026, the relief sought herein being subsumed in the subsequent writ petition. Leave is granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant