Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2167/2026 of SMTI AMBUJA SINGH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 26 April 2026
GAHC010056842026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2167/2026 SMTI AMBUJA SINGH W/O SRI AMIT SINGH, R/O PAILAPOOL, P.S. LAKHIPUR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788098 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE
GAHC010056842026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2167/2026
SMTI AMBUJA SINGH
W/O SRI AMIT SINGH, R/O PAILAPOOL, P.S. LAKHIPUR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788098
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M)- 6, ASSAM
2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
GOVT. OF ASSAM
FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 06
3:THE SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FOOD
PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP (M)-6
ASSAM
4:THE COMMISSIONER
FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES
CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND LEGAL METROLOGY DEPARTMENT
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP M
ASSAM
PIN 781005
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
CACHAR
SILCHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788001
6:THE CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
LAKHIPUR CO- DISTRICT
LAKHIPUR
CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788098
7:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CUM EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE
LAKHIPUR
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788098
8:THE SUPERINTENDENT
FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
LAKHIPUR SUB DIVISION
LAKHIPUR
PO AND PS LAKHIPUR
DIST CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN 78809
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. I. Alam, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Talukdar, Government Advocate BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 27.04.2026
Heard Mr. I. Alam, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. R. Talukdar, the learned Government
Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner would like to withdraw the instant writ petition without prejudice to the proceedings which have been initiated against the Petitioner.
3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. The withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not prejudice the Petitioner in the Show Cause proceedings which have been initiated against the Petitioner.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant