Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1640/2019 of JIBAMONI KAKOTY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 26 April 2026
GAHC010050462019 2025:GAU-AS:8568 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1640/2019 JIBAMONI KAKOTY S/O. LATE NAGENDRA NATH KAKOTY, HOUSE NO. 31, PATARKUCHI, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI- 781029, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM (M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010050462019
2025:GAU-AS:8568
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1640/2019
JIBAMONI KAKOTY
S/O. LATE NAGENDRA NATH KAKOTY, HOUSE NO. 31, PATARKUCHI, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI- 781029, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM
(M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-5.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19.
4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
ASSAM
SECRETARIAT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
5:THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GOVT. OF ASSAM
ASSAM SECRETARIAT
DISPUR GUWAHATI-6
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR, MS. S KAKATI,MR. N HASAN,MR. A
HASAN
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, EDU, SC, FINANCE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.06.2025 No one appears for the petitioner on call. Ms. B. Deka, learned counsel appears for the Education Department, while Ms. R. M. Barooh, learned counsel appears for the respondent Nos. 4 & 5. It is also noticed that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last two consecutive dates. Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant