Gauhati High Court
AB/358/2026 of SYED TANZIM ALAM ALIAS SYED TANZIM ALOM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 26 April 2026
GAHC010031242026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/358/2026 SYED TANZIM ALAM ALIAS SYED TANZIM ALOM S/O SYED JUBER ALAMGIR, R/O BUNDASHIL, BADARPUR, SRIBHUMI, PIN 788806, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
GAHC010031242026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/358/2026
SYED TANZIM ALAM ALIAS SYED TANZIM ALOM
S/O SYED JUBER ALAMGIR, R/O BUNDASHIL, BADARPUR, SRIBHUMI, PIN
788806, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, STATE OF ASSAM
2:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
BADARPUR POLICE STATION
DISTRICT SRIBHUMI
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K TALUKDAR, K G CHOWDHURY,L P BORAH,MR. J M A
CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 27.04.2026 Heard Ms. B. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of
Assam and Mr. B. Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. K. Gogoi, learned counsel for the informant.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 whereby the petitioner, Syed Tanzim Alam @ Syed Tanzim Alom is seeking Anticipatory Bail apprehending arrest in connection with an FIR, which is registered as Badarpur Police Station case No. 48/2025 registered under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/316(2)/316(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Sections 21(1)/21(2)/21(3) of the Banning of Unregulated Schemes Act, 2019.
3. It is submitted by the learned Addl. P.P that the case diary as called for has not been received and therefore the learned Addl. P.P submits that the case dairy may be awaited as it is not known whether the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating officer pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has duly appeared before the Investigating Officer and his statement is also been recorded.
7. Considering the fact that the other co-accused persons have been granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail, I see no reason to keep the matter pending for receipt of the case dairy as the Investigating officer has failed to produce the same today. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed.
8. The order of interim pre-arrest bail dated 19.02.2026 is hereby made absolute.
9. It is further provided that the petitioner shall continue to co-operate with the investigation and make himself available before the Investigating Officer as and when called for and shall not try to influence the witnesses in any manner or hamper or temper with the evidences.
10. The Anticipatory Bail petition, is accordingly stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant