Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/708/2024 of RENUKA KHAKHALARY AND 25 OTHERS Vs KAMALJIT TALUKDAR, ACS on 23 April 2026
GAHC010212212024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : Cont.Cas(C)/708/2024 RENUKA KHAKHALARY AND 25 OTHERS W/O- LATE TORUN KHAKLARY VILL- BURABURI P.O AND P.S- RANGJULI DIST-GOALPARA ASSAM 2: SADHANA DEVI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS W/O-
GAHC010212212024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case : Cont.Cas(C)/708/2024
RENUKA KHAKHALARY AND 25 OTHERS
W/O- LATE TORUN KHAKLARY
VILL- BURABURI
P.O AND P.S- RANGJULI
DIST-GOALPARA
ASSAM
2: SADHANA DEVI
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
W/O- NARESWAR BORO
VILL. AND PO.- BHALUKDUBI
PS- GOALPARA
DIST- GOALPARA
ASSAM
3: NGANGBAM MENAKA DEVI
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
W/O-JAHANGIR ALOM
VILL.-HURKAKUCHI
P.O.-GOBINDAPUR
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
4: HIRAMAI BORO
AGED- 46 YEARS
W/O.-SUBAL CH. MONDAL
VILL.- 1 NO
COLONY
ASHOK NAGAR
P.O.-GOALPARA
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
5: SHAHIDA KHATUN
AGED-49 YEARS
W/O.-AYUB ALI
VILL.-SHASTRI NAGAR
P.O.-BALADMARI
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
6: AFROJA BEGUM
AGED- 38 YEARS
W/O.- MAHMUD HUSSAIN
VILL.-KURSHAKATI
P.O.-AOLATULI
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
7: MANO BALA BARMAN
AGED-48 YEARS
W/O- SAYED ABDUL MALIK
VILL.-RUPNAGAR
P.O.-BALADMARI
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
8: RAWSHANARA AHMED
AGED-39 YEARS
W/O.-MOHIBUL ISLAM LASKAR
VILL.-JOYPUR BAZAR
P.O.-JOYPUR BAZAR
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
9: RENUKA PARBIN
AGED-40 YEARS
W/O.-SARIF HUSSAIN
VILL.- MILAN NAGAR
SANTIPUR
P.O.-BHALUKDUBI
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
10: GOLEJANNAH KHATUN
AGED-40 YEARS
W/O.-MOFIDUL HASAN ANSARY
VILL.-AMBARI
P.O.-AMBARI BAZAR
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
11: JESMINA PARVIN
AGED- 39 YEARS
W/O.-NASIR UDDIN
VILL.-ABRARBHITA
P.O.-BALARBHITA
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
12: MONUWARA KHATUN
AGED-39 YEARS
D/O.-JALIL MIYA
VILL.-BAHARI RESERVE
P.O.-BAHARIHAT
DIST.-BARPETA
ASSAM
13: ANJANA BALA NATH
AGED-37 YEARS
W/O.- RAM CHANDRA NATH
VILL.-BHELAKHAMAR
P.O.-KRISHNAI
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
14: MAJEDA KHATUN
AGED-34 YEARS
W/O.- ABDUL HAKIM
VILL.-TIPLAI PART-III
P.O.-TIPLAI
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
15: PURNIMA MONDAL
AGED-53 YEARS
W/O.-SANJIT DAS
VILL.-SILAPANI
P.O.-LAKHIPUR
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
16: MOMENA KHATUN
AGED-36 YEARS
W/O.-ROFIQUL ISLAM
VILL.-NIDANPUR PART-II
P.O.-LAKHIPUR
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
17: NIVA KALITA
AGED-48 YEARS
W/O.- DEB KUMAR NATH
VILL.-CHANDARIA WARD NO. 2
P.O.-GOALPARA
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
18: HAWATON NESSA
AGED-52 YEARS
W/O.-GAJIRAHMAN
VILL.-NAGARBERA
P.O.-NAGARBERA
DIST.-KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
19: MAHMUDA BEGUM
AGED-36 YEARS
W/O.-SUKAWAT ALI
VILL.-BAURARTOL
P.O.-MESERBHITA
DIST.-GOALPARA
ASSAM
20: SULTANA HAMIDA HUSSAIN
AGED-39 YEARS
W/O.- MD. SEKENDAR ALI
VILL.-KHUDRA POITARI
P.O.-JOYBHUM
DIST.-GAOLPARA
ASSAM
21: FATEEMA KHATUN
AGED-50 YEARS
W/O.-HABIBOR RAHMAN
VILL.-KURSHAKATI
P.O.-AOLATULI
DIST.-GAOLPARA
ASSAM
22: MONOWARA KHATUN
AGED-50 YEARS
W/O.- JAHANGIR HUSSAIN
VILL.-BHAGMARA CHAR
P.O.-BHAGMARA CHAR
DIST.-BARPETA
ASSAM
23: ANJANA RAY
AGED- 41 YEARS
W/O.-GOLAP RABHA
VILL.-SALPARA
P.O.-KRISHNAI
DIST.-GAOLPARA
ASSAM
24: SHOHIDA KHATUN
AGED-45 YEARS
W/O.-MOYNAL HOQUE
VILL.-FOLIMARI
P.O.-LAKHIPUR
DIST.-GAOLPARA
ASSAM
25: NURJAHAN BEGUM
AGED-46 YEARS
W/O.-BILLAL HUSSAIN
VILL.-CHAMPUPARA GAON
P.O.-CHAMPUPARA BAZAR
DIST.-KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
26: JYOTI PATAR
AGED- 39 YEARS
W/O- BINOY KUMAR BARMAN
VILL- LAKHIPUR
MILAN NAGAR
PO- LAKHIPUR
DIST- GOALPARA
ASSAM.
VERSUS
KAMALJIT TALUKDAR
ACS
DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES (FW)
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI-36
ASSAM
2:DR. SANJAY CHOUDHURY
ADDL CHIEF MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER (FW)
GOALPARA
PIN-783101
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : Ziadur Rahman
Advocate for : MRS D BORAH (R-1) appearing for KAMALJIT TALUKDAR
ACS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.04.2026
Mr. A. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has substantially complied with the direction of the Court and in view of the same, he has an instructions to withdraw this petition and prays accordingly. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant