Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./868/2026 of MD MAFIJUDDIN AHMED ALIAS MAFIZUDDIN AHMED ALIAS MAFIJ ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS on 23 April 2026
GAHC010061592026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./868/2026 MD MAFIJUDDIN AHMED ALIAS MAFIZUDDIN AHMED ALIAS MAFIJ ALI S/O- BAHAR ALI, RESIDING NEAR MASJID, MASHKHOWA, JALUGUTI, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM,
GAHC010061592026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./868/2026
MD MAFIJUDDIN AHMED ALIAS MAFIZUDDIN AHMED ALIAS MAFIJ ALI
S/O- BAHAR ALI,
RESIDING NEAR MASJID, MASHKHOWA, JALUGUTI, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782104, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS
REP BY PP ASSAM
2:RUKIYA BEGUM
(INFORMANT).
P.S CASE NO-33/2026
AGED 35 YRS
W/O- SUKUR ALI
R/O- JALUGUTI (JULAHGAON)
P.S- MORIGAON
DIST- MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782104
3:X (VICTIM)
AGE 13 YRS
D/O- ABDUL AZIZ
R/O- JALUGUTI
(JULAHGAON)
P.S- MORIGAON
DIST- MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-78210
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. C TALUKDAR, Y A SARKAR,K M KALITA,MR. S K
DEKA,A GAUTAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR D K BHATTACHARYYA (R-2,3)
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.04.2026 Heard Mr. A. Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Also heard learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 (Act 46/2023), praying for grant of regular bail to the petitioner.
3. The allegation against the present petitioner is that on the day on occurrence when the victim aged about 13 years had gone to the shop of the accused/petitioner to purchase cold drinks, the petitioner took her inside his shop and committed sexual assault upon her. The petitioner was arrested on 03.03.2026 subsequently in the instant case vide Order dated 25.03.2026, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was subsequently released from custody.
4. It appears that the informant side had filed a petition before for the learned Court below stating that the FIR have been lodged on misunderstanding and the informant side had no objection if the petitioner is granted bail.
5. Having regard to the above, the order of the interim bail dated 25.03.2026 is hereby made absolute.
6. Bail has been granted on the condition that the petitioner shall regularly participate in the trial if once comments and shall not try to influence the witnesses in any manner.
7. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant