Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/776/2020 of TOROP ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 23 April 2026
GAHC010024982020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/776/2020 TOROP ALI S/O LATE MOJIBOR RAHMAN, R/O VILL-NO. 2 BALADMARI CHAR, P.O.- GOALPARA, P.S.-GOALPARA, DIST-GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783101 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010024982020
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/776/2020
TOROP ALI
S/O LATE MOJIBOR RAHMAN, R/O VILL-NO. 2 BALADMARI CHAR, P.O.- GOALPARA, P.S.-GOALPARA, DIST-GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783101
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
GOVT. OF INDIA
NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
HOUSEFED COMPLEX
BELTOLA
BASISTHA ROAD
GUWAHATI-5
REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO. 3
3:DR. NIKHIL KUMAR
EDUCATION OFFICER
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
GOVT. OF INDIA
NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
HOUSEFED COMPLEX
BELTOLA
BASISTHA ROAD
GUWAHATI-5
4:WEST GOALPARA COLLEGE
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL CUM SECRETARY
WEST GOALPARA COLLEGE
GOALPARA
ASSAM
P.O.-BULARBHITA
P.S.-GOALPARA
DIST-GOLAPARA
ASSAM
PIN-783129
5:THE PRESIDENT
GOVERNING BODY OF WEST GOALPARA COLLEGE
P.O.-BULARBHITA
P.S.-GOALPARA
DIST-GOLAPARA
ASSAM
PIN-78312
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. H. Das, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Upamainyu, R-1
:Ms. S. Baruah, R-2
: Ms. R. Choudhury, R-4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24.04.2026
Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Upamainyu, learned counsel for the respondent No.1, Ms. S. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and Ms. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming an amount of Rs.8,50,000/- from the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. The materials which have been enclosed to the writ petition do not prima-facie goes to show that the petitioner have been able to make out a case for a direction for issuance of a writ upon the respondent authorities, more particularly, respondent Nos. 4 and 5 for releasing the amount as claimed by the petitioner. A perusal of Annexure-II which is enclosed to the writ petition mentions is the work order as claimed by the petitioner and from a perusal of the said work order, there is no mention whatsoever as to what is the consideration for which the work is to be carried out by the petitioner. It only mentions about construction of a women hostel under UGC grant within a period of 120 days and the payment will be made upon progress of the work. No document has been placed before this Court which would substantiate the completion of work by the petitioner.
3. Considering the above, this Court is not inclined to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution in the present facts and circumstance of the case. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. Before parting with the record, the Court however observes that the dismissal of the instant writ petition shall not prejudice or preclude the petitioner to approach the concerned competent Court of Civil jurisdiction, if so advised and permissible under law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant