Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./708/2026 of IKRAMUL ISLAM AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 23 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010049902026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./708/2026 IKRAMUL ISLAM AND ANR S/O KUDRAT ALI R/O VILL- 4 NO. BHURBANDHA P.S. RUPAHIHAT DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM 2: MUKTAR HUSSAIN S/O MOJIBUR RAHMAN R/O VILL. 4 NO.

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010049902026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./708/2026

IKRAMUL ISLAM AND ANR

S/O KUDRAT ALI

R/O VILL- 4 NO. BHURBANDHA P.S. RUPAHIHAT

DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM

2: MUKTAR HUSSAIN

S/O MOJIBUR RAHMAN

R/O VILL. 4 NO. BHURBANDHA P.S. RUPAHIHAT

DIST. NAGAON

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM

2:ATABUR RAHMAN (INFORMANT)

S/O LATE KUDDUS ALI R/O 4 NO. BHURBANDHA P.S. RUPOHIHAT DIST.

NAGAON

ASSAM

PH. NO. 936593568

Advocate for the Petitioner : DARAK ULLAH, MRS S N KHANDAKAR,MR. M A

LASKAR,MS A HUSSAIN,SABRISH AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. M K BROWN, (AMICUS CURIAE, R2),MR. B

CHOWDHURY(R2)

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

24.04.2026 Heard Mr. Darak Ullah, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Also heard Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned Amicus Curiae representing respondent No. 2. It is stated that the petitioner has crossed the statutory period of detention before the charge sheet has been filed, having spend 94 days behind the bars and the investigation is still pending. In view of the above, the petitioners are entitled default bail accordingly. It is directed that the petitioners shall be released on bail with a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Nogaon. Petitions stand disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead