Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/1394/2025 of SRI RABINDRA PHUKAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 April 2026
GAHC010271172025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1394/2025 SRI RABINDRA PHUKAN S/O LATE ROHIT PHUKAN R/O VILLAGE- PHULOGURI PUB SALMORA UNDER ROHA POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF NAGOAN ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE
GAHC010271172025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1394/2025
SRI RABINDRA PHUKAN
S/O
LATE ROHIT PHUKAN
R/O
VILLAGE- PHULOGURI PUB SALMORA UNDER ROHA POLICE STATION IN
THE DISTRICT OF NAGOAN
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY P.P.
ASSAM
2:SRI ABHINASH SARKAR
SON OF PALLAB SARKAR
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 19
PRINCIPAL J.B. ROAD UNDER CHANDMARI POLICE STATION IN THE
DISTRICT OF KAMRUP
------------
Advocate for : UJJAL CHOUDHURY
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Linked Case :CRL.A(J)/207/2025
SRI RABINDRA PHUKAN
S/O, LATE ROHIT PHUKAN ,
R/O, VILLAGE- PHULOGURI PUB SALMORA UNDER ROHA POLICE
STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF NAGOAN, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY PP AASSAM
2:SRI ABHINASH SARKAR
S/O
PALLAB SARKAR
R/O
HOUSE NO. 19
PRINCIPAL J.B. ROAD UNDER CHANDMARI POLICE STATION IN THE
DISTRICT OF KAMRU
Advocate for the Petitioner : UJJAL CHOUDHURY, MR. U CHOUDHURY, LEGAL AID
COUNSEL
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.04.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. U. Choudhury, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. PP for the State.
2. This is an application under Section 430(2) BNSS for suspending the sentence imposed upon the applicant/appellant on his conviction under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 read with Section 377 IPC vide Judgment dated 31.03.2022, passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Kamrup(M), Guwahati in Sessions Case No.256/2018, arising out of Chandmari P.S. Case No.329/2018.
3. Upon hearing the counsels for the parties at some length, we are of the view that the application cannot be allowed at this stage on account of the evidence of the victim and the Medical Officer (PW-4).
4. The application is accordingly rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant