Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./990/2026 of AJIBAR RAHMAN ALIAS AJIBOR RAHMAN AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 April 2026
GAHC010071352026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./990/2026 AJIBAR RAHMAN ALIAS AJIBOR RAHMAN AND ANR S/O HATEM ALI @ HAKIM ALI VILL- BOYZERALGA, PART-V, P.O. NAYERALGA, P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM,
GAHC010071352026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./990/2026
AJIBAR RAHMAN ALIAS AJIBOR RAHMAN AND ANR
S/O HATEM ALI @ HAKIM ALI
VILL- BOYZERALGA, PART-V, P.O. NAYERALGA, P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST.
DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783348
2: SOHIDUL ISLAM @ SAIDUL ISLAM
S/O DELBAR RAHMAN
DILBOR RAHMAN
VILL- BOYZERALGA
PART-V
P.O. NAYERALGA
P.S. BILASIPARA
D IST. DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-78334
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA, MR R A AHMED,MR. B HUSSAIN,MR. A A
MONDAL
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.04.2026
Heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioners as well as Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.
2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioners, namely, Ajibar Rahman @ Ajibor Rahman and Sohidul Islam @ Saidul Islam, praying for grant of bail in connection with Bilasipara P.S. Case No.391/2025 under Sections 103(1) BNS 2023. They were arrested on 22-01-2026.
3. On 19-12-2025, the father of the deceased lodged an FIR alleging that his 17 year son had gone to a religious meeting on the previous evening and upon returning back, he did not find him at home. Later on, his brother-in-law found his dead body in a nearby jungle and several injuries were found on his body.
4. No one is named in the FIR. The present accused persons were arrested during the investigation. The grounds of arrest mentions about their involvement in the alleged incident of killing of the victim.
5. It is fairly submitted that in earlier bail petition was rejected on 31/03/2026, passed in BA 701/2026.
6. Mr. N.J. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has completed 91 days in under trial detention and as per his instruction, the investigation is not yet completed and therefore, the petitioner seeks default bail.
7. Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P. fairly submits that investigation is still in progress and not yet completed.
8. In the given facts and circumstances, I allow the subsequent bail petition and the petitioner is hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs.50,000/- each with one surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned learned Court and subject to the following conditions:-
(i) They shall cooperate with remaining investigation,
(ii) They shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence,
(iii) They shall not try to influence witnesses or harm or harass the informant/victim side in any manner.
9. Violation of any of the bail conditions, shall entail cancelation of bail.
10. Bail petition stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant