Gauhati High Court
AB/329/2026 of SAHADEV PATOR AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 April 2026
GAHC010026572026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/329/2026 SAHADEV PATOR AND ANR S/O LT KAMAL CH PATOR, R/O VILL MAKARIA, PO NELLIE,PS JAGIROAD, DIST MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN 782413 2: JITU PATOR S/O BIREN PATOR R/O VILL
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010026572026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/329/2026
SAHADEV PATOR AND ANR
S/O LT KAMAL CH PATOR, R/O VILL MAKARIA, PO NELLIE,PS JAGIROAD, DIST MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN 782413
2: JITU PATOR
S/O BIREN PATOR
R/O VILL MAKARIA
PO NELLIE
PS JAGIROAD
DIST MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN 78241
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL, A A AHMED,MR. A W MONDAL,MR K
ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.04.2026
Page No.# 2/2 Heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. P.P. for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, for granting anticipatory bail in connection with Jagiroad P.S. Case No.235/2025, under Section 318 (4)/ 336 (3)/ 340 (2)/ 351(3) of BNS, 2023.
3. The petitioners were in interim protection by the order dated 16.02.2026. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners have participated in the investigation and their statements have been recorded.
4. The learned Addl. P.P. has produced the case diary. On going through the stage of the investigation and the case diary, this court is of the opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners should not be necessary at this stage. Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioner is hereby made absolute.
5. Anticipatory bail petition is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant