Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./965/2026 of DULAL SK ALIAS DULAL SEIKH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 April 2026
GAHC010067432026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./965/2026 DULAL SK ALIAS DULAL SEIKH S/O-NUR MAHAMMAD ALL ALIAS NUR MAHAMAD ALI VILL-DALANER ALGA PT-II. P.S- GAURIPUR. DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010067432026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./965/2026
DULAL SK ALIAS DULAL SEIKH
S/O-NUR MAHAMMAD ALL ALIAS NUR MAHAMAD ALI VILL-DALANER
ALGA PT-II. P.S- GAURIPUR. DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A S CHOUDHURY, S. HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.04.2026
Heard Mr. A.S. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, for granting regular bail to the accused/petitioner who was arrested on 25.02.2025 in connection with Bogribari P.S. Case No.08/2026 under Section 303(2) of the BNSS.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are that he was involved in theft, during which the informant had withdrawn a certain amount of money from the bank. The said amount was stolen from the informant by an unknown person.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has already spent 58 days in custody. He has further submitted that the co-accused has been granted bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Kokrajhar, on 17.04.2026.
5. The learned counsel has submitted that the petitioner would cooperate with the investigation if granted the privilege of bail. The learned Addl. P.P has objected on the grounds that the investigation is still going on, that the stolen money has not been recovered, and he has been identified as a person who was seen inside the bank premises, in all probability, shadowing the informant and had been involved in the incident of theft.
6. Having regard to the length of detention and the progress of the investigation, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner can be granted the privilege of bail subject to strict conditions. Accordingly, it is provided that the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, one of whom shall be a local person of the concerned jurisdictional Court, one of whom shall be a Government servant to the satisfaction of the learned Jurisdicational Court under the following conditions:
(i) The learned Jurisdictional Court shall be at liberty to impose such conditions upon the petitioner to ensure his participation in the investigation process.
(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigation officer once every fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and also appear as and when required by the investigation authority to participate in the investigation.
7. Bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant