Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/8749/2018 of JEHIRUL ALAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 21 April 2026
GAHC010280892018 2026:GAU-AS:5504 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8749/2018 JEHIRUL ALAM S/O- LATE SHAH JAMAT, R/O- AROHAN PATH, H NO. 8, P.O SILPUKHURI, P.S- CHANDMARI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010280892018
2026:GAU-AS:5504
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/8749/2018
JEHIRUL ALAM
S/O- LATE SHAH JAMAT, R/O- AROHAN PATH, H NO. 8, P.O SILPUKHURI, P.S- CHANDMARI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REP. BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06
2:THE SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPTT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 06
3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF
FOREST FORCE
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI- 06
4:THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE
HEADED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 0
Advocate for the Petitioner : ,
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, SC, FOREST
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.04.2026 None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called. However, Mr. I. Borthakur, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, submits that the petitioner has remained unrepresented on two consecutive dates, i.e., on 07.06.2024 and 08.04.2025. From the record, it reveals that on 27.06.2022, Mr. J. I. Borbhuiya, who earlier represented the petitioner, informed this Court that the petitioner had taken away the brief from him and that no new counsel has been appointed till date. From the above, it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant