Gauhati High Court
AB/242/2026 of DEEPANJALI MEDHI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 21 April 2026
GAHC010020812026 2026:GAU-AS:5492 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/242/2026 DEEPANJALI MEDHI D/O- HAREKRISHNA MEDHI, R/O- PUB NIZARAPUR, JALUKBARI,NEAR- AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, P.S. -JALUKBARI, DISTRICT KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, VERSUS THE
GAHC010020812026
2026:GAU-AS:5492
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/242/2026
DEEPANJALI MEDHI
D/O- HAREKRISHNA MEDHI,
R/O- PUB NIZARAPUR, JALUKBARI,NEAR- AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, P.S.
-JALUKBARI, DISTRICT KAMRUP (M), ASSAM,
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S M MOLLAH, MR R ALI,MRS. S BEGUM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. M BEGUM(INFORMANT),S
NATH(INFORMANT),S N NATH(INFORMANT)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.04.2026 Heard Mr. N.J. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for anticipatory bail to the petitioner, namely, Deepanjali Medhi, in connection with Jalukbari PS Case No.26/2026 registered under Sections 108/117(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already appeared before the Investigating Authority and has fully cooperated with the investigation.
4. The learned APP submits that the case diary has been received, which reveals that the petitioner has participated in the investigation process. It is further submitted that seizures have also been made in the meantime. The learned APP additionally submits that the Investigating Officer has prayed for rejection of the prayer for anticipatory bail, as the petitioner is allegedly involved in the abetment of the suicide of one of the persons connected with the incident.
5. In view of the above submissions, this Court is of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner at this stage may not be necessary. Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioner on the earlier occasion is hereby made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall continue to appear before and cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required.
6. In the event of any violation of the conditions imposed upon the petitioner, the same shall be brought to the notice of the appropriate Court for necessary consideration in accordance with law.
7. With the above observations, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant