Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/7279/2023 of MAMTAZ @ MOMATAJ BEGUM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 21 April 2026
GAHC010278332023 2026:GAU-AS:5505 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7279/2023 MAMTAZ @ MOMATAJ BEGUM WIFE OF FAKAR UDDIN AHMED, VILL- BHURAKATA PAM, PO- PANIKHAITI, PS- SUALKUCHI RPS, DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM PHONE NO- 9859043615
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010278332023
2026:GAU-AS:5505
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7279/2023
MAMTAZ @ MOMATAJ BEGUM
WIFE OF FAKAR UDDIN AHMED, VILL- BHURAKATA PAM, PO- PANIKHAITI, PS- SUALKUCHI RPS, DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM PHONE NO- 9859043615
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY (SOCIAL
WELFARE) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
2:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
UZANBAZAR
GUWAHATI-01
3:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER
KAMRUP
AT AMINGAON
PIN- 781031
4:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER (CDPO)
INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICE
RAMPUR
DIST.- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781132
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP
AMINGAON
Page No.# 2/2
P.O. AND P.S. AMINAGON
DIST.- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781031
6:FULMALA KHATUN
W/O- SAIFUR RAHMAN @ SAIFUL ISLAM
RESIDENT OF UDMURI
P.O. MAJGUMI
P.S. CHHAYGAON
DIST.- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 78113
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ALI, MR. Y ALI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.04.2026 Heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed; therefore, the petition has become infructuous and is sought to be withdrawn. Prayer is allowed. The present petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant