Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./976/2026 of MILY TISSOPI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 21 April 2026
GAHC010070012026 2026:GAU-AS:5487 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./976/2026 MILY TISSOPI WIFE OF LATE BIDYASING TERRON RESIDENT OF BHEK KILING GAON, P.S. BOITHALANGSO DIST. WEST KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010070012026
2026:GAU-AS:5487
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./976/2026
MILY TISSOPI
WIFE OF LATE BIDYASING TERRON
RESIDENT OF BHEK KILING GAON, P.S. BOITHALANGSO DIST. WEST
KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M SAIKIA, MR. S MILI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.04.2026 Heard Mr. M. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for the granting of bail to the petitioner, namely, Sri Mily Tissopi, who is in custody since 30.01.2026, in connection with Diphu PS Case No.1/2026 registered under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The learned APP submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed vide C.S. No. 15/2026 dated 25.03.2026.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in custody for about 85 days and, since the investigation is now complete and the charge-sheet has been submitted, she may be granted the privilege of bail. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to participate in the trial as and when required.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP submits that releasing the petitioner at this stage may not be appropriate as the trial has not yet commenced and the evidence is yet to be recorded.
6. Having considered the length of detention suffered by the petitioner, who is a lady aged about 51 years, the contents of the FIR, and the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may be granted the privilege of bail at this stage. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 40,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, one of whom shall be a government servant, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. The learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to impose such further conditions as may be deemed necessary to ensure the petitioner’s participation in the trial proceedings.
7. Bail petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant