Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./838/2026 of NUR ALOM SK Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 20 April 2026
GAHC010051802026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./838/2026 NUR ALOM SK S/O LT KASOM ALI, R/O CHOURANGIMORE, WARD NO 13, PS GAURIPUR, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN 783331 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE
GAHC010051802026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./838/2026
NUR ALOM SK
S/O LT KASOM ALI, R/O CHOURANGIMORE, WARD NO 13, PS GAURIPUR, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN 783331
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SANU HUSSAIN, SIRAJ CHOUDHURY,K. KALITA,MS P
BARMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 21-04-2026 Heard Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This is a petition paying for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, for granting bail to the petitioner in connection with Special Case No. 260/2025
pending in the court of the learned Special Judge, Dhubri. The petitioner was arrested on 05.10.2025. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the trial is proceeding before the learned Trial Court, and up to now, four witnesses have been examined.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been cooperating in the trial, and the statement of the witnesses examined till now could not be enough to implicate the petitioner with the alleged offence.
4. The learned Addl. P.P has submitted that already four out of the seven proposed witnesses have been examined. At this stage, the petitioner may not be granted the privilege of bail since the trial is proceeding at the right pace.
5. On an earlier occasion, this court had granted the liberty to the petitioner to approach the Trial Court to pray for regular bail, and it has been submitted that upon approach to the learned Trial Court, the bail petition of the petitioner had been rejected since only two witnesses had been examined by the prosecution, and five remain to be examined.
6. Having gone through the scanned copy of the TCR, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner can be granted the privilege of bail at this stage since four witnesses have already been examined and two of them, the seizure witnesses, have also been examined and cross-examined.
7. In such an event, the Court directs that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, where one of the sureties shall be a government servant. The learned Trial Court shall also be at liberty to impose such other conditions as may be deemed necessary to ensure the participation of the petitioner in the remainder of the trial.
8. The Bail Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant