Gauhati High Court
W.P.(Crl.)/34/2024 of RAJIB SHARMA Vs THE INDUSIND BANK LTD AND 4 ORS on 19 April 2026
GAHC010225472024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/34/2024 RAJIB SHARMA SON OF SRI AJIT KUMAR SARMA, RESIDENT OF BARBARI MAGZINE, VIP ROAD, POST OFFICE- HENGRABARI, POLICE STATION- DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010225472024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/34/2024
RAJIB SHARMA
SON OF SRI AJIT KUMAR SARMA, RESIDENT OF BARBARI MAGZINE, VIP
ROAD, POST OFFICE- HENGRABARI, POLICE STATION- DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, PIN- 781036, MOBILE
NO.- 9401985887
VERSUS
THE INDUSIND BANK LTD AND 4 ORS
EAST-II, REPRESENTED BY ITS ZONAL HEAD, ZONE (ASSAM, MANIPUR, MEGHALAYA, MIZORAM, NAGALAND, SIKKIM, TRIPURA, WEST BENGAL)
SAKET TOWER, 6TH FLOOR KOLKATA- 700016
2:THE INDUSIND BANK LTD.
REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER
CONSUMER FINANCE DIVISION
2ND FLOOR
ABOVE BATA SHOW ROOM
G.S.ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI- 781005
3:THE AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
INDUSIND BANK LTD.
ABOVE BATA SHOW ROOM
2ND FLOOR
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI- 781005
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
SOUTH DIVISION
Page No.# 2/2
PARK STREET
SECTOR-I
MULLICK BAZAR ELGIN
CALCUTTA- 700016
5:THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE PARK STREET-POLICE STATION
PARK STREET
MULLICK BAZAR TALTALA
CALCUTTA- 70001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R SARMA, MS DIPALI DUTTA,MS. S D SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20-04-2026 Mr. R. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has submitted that he is under instructions not to press the present writ in the present form. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed in its present form.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant