Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/142/2025 of HUSSAIN AHMED LASKAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 1 April 2026
GAHC010018202025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/142/2025 HUSSAIN AHMED LASKAR S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM. 2: SAYED AHMED @ SAYED AHMED
GAHC010018202025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/142/2025
HUSSAIN AHMED LASKAR
S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA
R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR
P/S. SONAPUR
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM.
2: SAYED AHMED @ SAYED AHMED LASKAR @ SAHID AHEMAD LASKAR
S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA
R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR
P/S. SONAPUR
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
3: JAHIR AHMED LASKAR
S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA
R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR
P/S. SONAPUR
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE PP
ASSAM
2:MD RUHUL AMIN
S/O. LT. ABDUL GAFUR
R/O. KACHUTOLI PATHAR
P/S. SONAPUR
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN-782402.
------------
Advocate for : MR. N MAHAJAN
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.04.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. D Bora, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants. Also heard Ms. A Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent. This is an application under Section 430 BNSS, 2023, for suspension of the sentence imposed upon the applicants/ appellants by the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) No. 3, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in Sessions Case No. 300/2016 vide judgment and order dated 26.12.2024, convicting them under Sections 302/34 IPC. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties and as can be seen from the impugned judgment and order, there are injured eye witnesses to the crime in question. The evidence of PW-2 and PW-3 is to the effect that they were hit by the applicants/appellants, due to which they had become unconscious. Further, their brother, Jakir Hussain had died at GMCH in view of the assault made on him by the applicants/appellants. On considering the above facts, we do not find that a case for grant of bail and/or suspension of the sentence imposed upon the applicants/appellants is made out. As such, we do not find it proper to allow the present application for suspension of the sentence and grant the applicants/appellants bail at this stage. Accordingly, the present interlocutory application, stands rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant