Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/109/2026 of SANKAR YADAV @ SANKAR RAI Vs STATE OF ASSAM on 1 April 2026
GAHC010248722025 2026:GAU-AS:4863- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/109/2026 SANKAR YADAV @ SANKAR RAI SON OF LATE JAGADISH RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHEJURBAGAN, P.S.- NEW CAPITAL COMPLEX, DISTRICT- WEST TRIPURA,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010248722025
2026:GAU-AS:4863-
DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/109/2026
SANKAR YADAV @ SANKAR RAI
SON OF LATE JAGADISH RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHEJURBAGAN, P.S.- NEW CAPITAL COMPLEX, DISTRICT- WEST TRIPURA, TRIPURA.
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. P AGARWAL (LEGAL AID COUNSEL), Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.04.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Dr. Pooja Agarwal, learned legal aid counsel for the applicant submits that there is a delay of 2090 days in preferring the connected appeal from jail.
Page No.# 2/2 Ms. A Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that she has no objection to the delay being condoned. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties and keeping in view the reasons for the delay, we condone the delay of 2090 days in filing the connected appeal from jail. Registry to register and list the connected appeal after a week. The instant interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant