Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/346/2026 of SRI SARAT PHUKAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. on 31 March 2026
GAHC010064422026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/346/2026 SRI SARAT PHUKAN SON OF LATE UMA PHUKAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AKHAIYA GAON P.S.- MORANHAT DISTRICT- CHARAIDEO ASSAM PIN-785673 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010064422026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/346/2026
SRI SARAT PHUKAN
SON OF LATE UMA PHUKAN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AKHAIYA GAON
ASSAM
PIN-785673
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ASSAM
2:SMTI MOUSUMI BARUAH
W/O- SRI BADHIN BARUAH R/O- VILLAGE- AKHOYA GAON
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : U SWARGIARY
Advocate for : PP
ASSA appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
In Crl.A./124/2026
SRI SARAT PHUKAN
SON OF LATE UMA PHUKAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AKHAIYA GAON, P.S.- MORANHAT, DISTRICT- CHARAIDEO, ASSAM, PIN-785673
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
2:SMTI MOUSUMI BARUAH
W/O- SRI BADHIN BARUAH
R/O- VILLAGE- AKHOYA GAON
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : U SWARGIARY, MR. R BURAGOHAIN,MR. B PHUKAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 01/04/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Mr. B. Phukan, Learned Counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, Learned APP, Assam, appearing for the State.
2. This is an application for suspending the sentence imposed upon the applicant/appellant pursuant to his conviction under section 376 AB IPC, vide the judgement and order dated 13/02/2026 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge, Charaideo, in Special (POCSO) Case No. 23/2018.
3. In view of the impugned judgement and order being set aside and the matter being remanded to the learned Trial Court, there is no sentence to be suspended in this case. The question of whether the applicant/appellant should be granted bail may be agitated before the learned Trial Court.
4. IA is accordingly closed in terms of the order passed in the main case.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant