Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/336/2026 of SRI NARAYAN KONWAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. on 29 March 2026
GAHC010061952026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/336/2026 SRI NARAYAN KONWAR SON OF SRI ANANTA KONWAR,RESIDENT OF -RAJA PATHAR SAMGAON,POLICE STATION-BOKOLIA, DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010061952026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/336/2026
SRI NARAYAN KONWAR
SON OF SRI ANANTA KONWAR,RESIDENT OF -RAJA PATHAR
SAMGAON,POLICE STATION-BOKOLIA,
DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
2:SMTI NIPA SONOWAL
WIFE OF SRI GOJEN SONOWAL
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BAMUNBETONI GAON
POLICE STATION- BORHOLIA
DISTRICT-JORHAT ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B SARMA, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
SRI NARAYAN KONWAR
SON OF SRI ANANTA KONWAR
RESIDENT OF -RAJA PATHAR SAMGAON
POLICE STATION-BOKOLIA
DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
Page No.# 2/2
2:SMTI NIPA SONOWAL
WIFE OF SRI GOJEN SONOWAL
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BAMUNBETONI GAON
POLICE STATION-BORHOLIA
DISTRICT-JORHAT ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MS BIJITA SARMA
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30.03.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 41 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Ms. A. Begum, learned Addl. PP., Assam submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay of 41 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same after a week. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant