Gauhati High Court
CRP/231/2016 of MANOS JYOTI MAZUMDAR Vs SMT. BANDANA DAS and 2 ORS. on 26 March 2026
GAHC010115032016 2026:GAU-AS:4435 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/231/2016 MANOS JYOTI MAZUMDAR S/OLT. BIMAL MAZUMDAR R/O C/O "ELECTRA", M.C. ROAD, TEZPUR, P.O. TEZPUR MOUZA- MAHABHAIRAB, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM. VERSUS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010115032016
2026:GAU-AS:4435
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP/231/2016
MANOS JYOTI MAZUMDAR
S/OLT. BIMAL MAZUMDAR R/O C/O "ELECTRA", M.C. ROAD, TEZPUR, P.O.
TEZPUR MOUZA- MAHABHAIRAB, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
SMT. BANDANA DAS and 2 ORS.
D/O LT. SOMEN DAS
2:SRI RONAL DAS
S/O LT. SOMEN DAS
3:SMTI. MINU DAS
W/O LT. GOURISH CHANDRA DAS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF M.C. ROAD
TEZPUR
P.O. TEZPUR
MOUZA- MAHABHAIRAB
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P SUNDI, Advocate for the Respondent : MR H J TAMULI (R1-R3), MR. B CHAKRABORTY,MR D
KALITA,MR H J TAMULI
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
27.03.2026 None appeared for the petitioner on call. Heard Mr. H J Tamuli, learned counsel for the respondents. It appears that on the last occasion, i.e., 26.03.2026 as well, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on call. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed today with the remark ‘for dismissal’ in the cause list. The matter having been listed today with the remark ‘for dismissal’, indicating the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. P Sundi, there is still no representation on behalf of the petitioner today on call. In view of the consecutive non-appearance of the petitioner, the instant petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, accordingly stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant