Gauhati High Court
Crl.Pet./879/2025 of RAKESH KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 25 March 2026
GAHC010157082025 2026:GAU-AS:4498 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./879/2025 RAKESH KUMAR DAS S/O- SRI SURENDRA NATH DAS. R/O- H.NO.22, WARD NO.56, PATORKUCHI ROAD, BASISTHA CHARIALI, P.O. AND P.S.- BASISTHA, DIST.-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010157082025
2026:GAU-AS:4498
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./879/2025
RAKESH KUMAR DAS
S/O- SRI SURENDRA NATH DAS.
R/O- H.NO.22, WARD NO.56, PATORKUCHI ROAD, BASISTHA CHARIALI, P.O. AND P.S.- BASISTHA, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BISWAS, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
26.03.2026 Heard Mr S Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr R J Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam.
Page No.# 2/2
2. Mr S Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that when the entire proceeding have been closed on submission of a Final Report, the petitioner had approached this Court challenging the order of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (Metro), in connection with Dispur PS Case No. 4048/2021.
3. Mr Biswas has submitted that on a petition being filed before the learned Trial Court, raising grievances against accepting the Final Report, the learned Trial Court has, by the order dated 13.03.2026, passed in Dispur PS Case No. 4048/2021, rejected the Final Report and has remitted the matter back for further investigation by an Officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, who would conduct an independent, objective and time-bound investigation addressing the specific queries noted in the order itself.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the time being, the grievances of the petitioner stand redressed and this Criminal Petition would not require any further adjudication for the moment.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition stands closed.
6. The petitioner would be at liberty to raise any future grievances, without reference to the closure of this criminal petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant