Gauhati High Court
AB/9/2026 of MD TARIFUL HUSSAIN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 March 2026
GAHC010289412025 2026:GAU-AS:4494 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/9/2026 MD TARIFUL HUSSAIN S/O- KADIR ALI, R/O VILL. UDIANA P.O. AND P.S- RANGIA, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010289412025
2026:GAU-AS:4494
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/9/2026
MD TARIFUL HUSSAIN
S/O- KADIR ALI, R/O VILL. UDIANA P.O. AND P.S- RANGIA, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : N. UDDIN, R KHA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
25.03.2026 Heard Mr R Khan learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr R J Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. The FIR reveals that the persons who were arrested along with the alleged contraband had indicated that the same was acquired from the petitioner herein.
3. Perused the contents of the Case Diary.
Page No.# 2/2
4. The investigation is at an initial stage. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer to participate in the investigation, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner would not be entitled to the grant of pre-arrest bail at this stage.
5. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected at this stage.
...
JUDGE Comparing Assistant