Gauhati High Court
AB/408/2026 of SAHAJAN AHMED LASKAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 March 2026
GAHC010038222026 2026:GAU-AS:4495 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/408/2026 SAHAJAN AHMED LASKAR S/O-LATE ISLAM UDDIN LASKAR RESIDENT OF - HATIRHAR PART-II P.O.- SRIKONA P.S.-SILCHAR DIST.-CACHAR, ASSAM, 788026 VERSUS THE STATE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010038222026
2026:GAU-AS:4495
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/408/2026
SAHAJAN AHMED LASKAR
S/O-LATE ISLAM UDDIN LASKAR RESIDENT OF- HATIRHAR PART-II P.O.- SRIKONA P.S.-SILCHAR DIST.-CACHAR, ASSAM, 788026
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N A MAZARBHUIYA, M H LASKAR,MR N Z CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
25.03.2026 Heard Mr N A Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr K K Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
Page No.# 2/2
2. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer.
3. The Case Diary does not reveal the requirement of custodial interrogation of the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the privilege of interim bail granted to the petitioner is hereby made absolute, during the period of investigation.
4. The Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant