Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./4073/2025 of MD MATLIP UDDIN AHMED ALIAS MATLIB UDDIN AHMED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 23 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010280972025 2026:GAU-AS:4240 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4073/2025 MD MATLIP UDDIN AHMED ALIAS MATLIB UDDIN AHMED S/O- LATE SULEMAN ALI, VILL- N.K GADHUWA, P.S- MANGALDAI, DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010280972025

2026:GAU-AS:4240

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./4073/2025

MD MATLIP UDDIN AHMED ALIAS MATLIB UDDIN AHMED

S/O- LATE SULEMAN ALI,

VILL- N.K GADHUWA, P.S- MANGALDAI, DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REP BY THE PP, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : K RAHMAN, MR. SAIDUL ALOM,MR. N. ISLAM

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

24.03.2026 Heard Mr K Rahman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr R J Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

2. The petitioner was granted interim protection by the order dated 28.01.2026. The petitioner had already spent 50 days in custody, by the time he was granted interim bail by this Court and the statutory period in the present case would be Page No.# 2/2 of 60 days. The Court has also noticed that the other accused in the same FIR had been granted pre-arrest bail.

3. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already cooperated in the investigation to the best of his ability during the period of custody itself.

4. The Case Diary as received by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is updated till December, 2025.

5. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that further custody of the petitioner in connection with Mangaldai PS Case No. 216/2025, under Sections 115(2)/191(2)/318(4)/324(5)/61(2)/ 76 BNS, corresponding to GR Case No. 843/2025, is not necessary during investigation. Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 28.01.2026, is hereby made absolute. The petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court if, as and when summons are received. The petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation of the case and shall cooperate with the investigation, as and when necessary or called for by the Investigating Officer.

6. Bail Application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead