Gauhati High Court
RSA/89/2019 of ON THE DEATH OF RAJAN ALI, HIS LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTING Vs ON THE DEATH OF AJIJUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY, HIS LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTING AND 6 ORS. on 18 March 2026
GAHC010051452019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/89/2019 ON THE DEATH OF RAJAN ALI, HIS LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTING HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 1.1: SUNABAN BIBI (WIFE) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI
GAHC010051452019
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/89/2019
ON THE DEATH OF RAJAN ALI, HIS LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTING
HAILAKANDI, ASSAM
1.1: SUNABAN BIBI (WIFE)
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.2: JAMIRUDDIN (SON)
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.3: SAYANA BEGU @ BEDURA (DAUGHTER)
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.4: HAZIRA BEGUM (DAUGHTER)
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.5: NAZIRA BEGUM (DAUGHTER)
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.6: MONOWARA BEGUM (DAUGHTER)
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.7: DILWARA BEGUM (DAUGHTER)
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.8: ABDUL HUSSAIN
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.9: JAHIRA BEGUM (DAUGHTER)
R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR
P.O. KALIBAZAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150
VERSUS
ON THE DEATH OF AJIJUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY, HIS LEGAL HEIRS
REPRESENTING AND 6 ORS.
HAILAKANDI, ASSAM.
1.1:REHATUN NESSA CHOUDHURY (WIFE)
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.2:MASUK AHMED CHOUDHURY (SON)
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.3:MEHBUB AHMED CHOUDHURY (SON)
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.4:JOBBER AHMED CHOUDHURY (SON)
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
1.5:ASRAFUL BARI CHOUDHURY (SON)
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
2:MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
S/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
3:SAJJADUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
S/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY
C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
4:ABDUL RAKIB CHOUDHURY
S/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY
C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
5:TAIBUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
S/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY
C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
6:HAZIRA BIBI CHOUDHURY
D/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY
C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150.
7:KHADIZA BIBI CHOUDHURY
D/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY
C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I
P.O. CHANDIPUR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
PIN- 788150
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M H RAJBARBHUIYAN, MS. S RASUL
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. N SARKAR, MS F AHMED
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 19-03-2026 None appears for the appellant on call. Pertinent that on the last date, i.e., 17.03.2026 also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant on call and accordingly, the matter was directed to be re-posted today with the remark “For dismissal.” The matter being so listed today with the aforesaid remark, reflecting the names of the learned counsels appearing for the appellant, i.e., Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuiyan and Ms. S. Rasul as well as Ms. N. Sarkar and Ms. F. Ahmed, for the respondents, there has been no representation either from the appellant or from the respondents side. Be that as it may, in view of non-representation of the appellant on consecutive dates, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant